Category: Let's talk
PERHAPS SIMILAR to ANOTHER topic that I've posted, I wanna touch on any thought-of situation that carries the end above-subject-title result. ONE of which is a group discussion that I was involved in, where the SUBJECT MATTER happened to be "RIGHT AND WRONG." According to popular view, the VERY ABSOLUTE of either or was denied, in favor of "RELATIVE OPINION." The VERY HIGHLIGHT of this discussion was that in line with THAT, a DEFINITELY STUNNING, THOUGHT-PROVOKATIVE QUESTION was asked, which I'M going to ask HERE, MYSELF: "Does ANYONE'S ""LEGAL RIGHT" to be ""MORALLY WRONG" MAKE ""UNIVERSAL WRONG" UNIVERSALLY RIGHT?" If so, and/or if NOT, how?
I don't care what anyone says, being wrong is not right, whether it's one person or a group of people that are wrong. I do agree that in some situations ignorance is bliss, but ignorance is not okay and shouldn't be acceptable. If you are wrong and know it, you should seek correction if you think that being right or correct is or will be important. I also think that if others see that another person or group of people are wrong, they should make an effort to correct them whether they believe it rude or not. I believe that leaving someone ignorant or letting them continue to be wrong is way more rude than correcting someone. Those who make efforts to correct others should always remember that manner matters. Well, not always, but if the other person gets offended, that's their own fucking problem.
Anyway, I hope my response shows that I understood the question clearly. And if not, someone please expound, so that I may respond to this correctly.
I don't care what anyone says, being wrong is not right, whether it's one person or a group of people that are wrong. I do agree that in some situations ignorance is bliss, but ignorance is not okay and shouldn't be acceptable. If you are wrong and know it, you should seek correction if you think that being right or correct is or will be important. I also think that if others see that another person or group of people are wrong, they should make an effort to correct them whether they believe it rude or not. I believe that leaving someone ignorant or letting them continue to be wrong is way more rude than correcting someone. Those who make efforts to correct others should always remember that manner matters. Well, not always, but if the other person gets offended, that's their own fucking problem.
Anyway, I hope my response shows that I understood the question clearly. And if not, someone please expound, so that I may respond to this correctly.
I don't care what anyone says, being wrong is not right, whether it's one person or a group of people that are wrong. I do agree that in some situations ignorance is bliss, but ignorance is not okay and shouldn't be acceptable. If you are wrong and know it, you should seek correction if you think that being right or correct is or will be important. I also think that if others see that another person or group of people are wrong, they should make an effort to correct them whether they believe it rude or not. I believe that leaving someone ignorant or letting them continue to be wrong is way more rude than correcting someone. Those who make efforts to correct others should always remember that manner matters. Well, not always, but if the other person gets offended, that's their own fucking problem.
Anyway, I hope my response shows that I understood the question clearly. And if not, someone please expound, so that I may respond to this correctly.
I apologize to the extreme for posting three times. Huge Mistake!
it seems to me that "wrong" is a really big word. Are we talking about moral issues or opinions?
not to be a bitchy school teacher, but I am assuming you are refering to condemnation? the way it was misspelled I am not sure.
When you RANDOMLY capitalize words in text, it looks like you are YELLING AT EVERYONE on the internet.
Now, that said...
Morality is an individual issue. One person, for example, might consider eating pork to be a sin condemnable by death, while someone else might eat ham sandwiches every day. One person might see murder as a crime no matter what the case, while another might see a woman defending her child as a justifiable reason to shoot another person.
Therefore, "Legally right" and "Morally Wrong" aren't concepts that one can compare - it's all up to the individual.
What? Just because people don't agree doesn't mean that there's not right or wrong in the matter! That's like saying that some people think the sky is most often blue or grey, while others think it is most often purple or lime green, and therefore it's an individual matter. That's clearly not true--the latter group of people are simply wrong. So, the fact that there is no agreement does not at all prove that something is simply up to the individual. It is perfectly conceivable that there are things that are right, and things are wrong, even if some people are mistaken about what they are.
As far as any MISSPELLING might've been concerned, I checked BOTH "CONDONATION" and "CONDEMNATION," and NEITHER OF WHICH were wrong, as far as I know, but if I'm INCORRECT, as far as the CONTEXT of EITHER/OR or BOTH, I'm sure that anyone would let me know. ALSO, in response to all that's been said about "RIGHT" and "WRONG," as to whenever such lines up with "MORAL" and "LEGAL," depending on ANY GIVEN SITUATION, PERSONAL OPINIONS of "right" and "wrong" DO HAVE their PLACE, but NOT ALWAYS. THAT seems to be the VERY CHALLENGE to ANY/ALL of us, who'd RATHER be in TOTAL CONTROL, and ANYTHING that's ANY SHORT of THAT would be OUT OF CONTROL, EVEN IF BEING CONTROLED by ANY OTHER, either THAN OURSELVES, or who WE'D want, as opposed to ANY OTHER ELSE.